Start free →

Sample (fictional) · B2B SaaS · 営業支援 SaaS

SERVICE OBSERVATION REPORT

(Fictional) Acme SaaS— AI visibilityGENERATED 2026-08-05

OVERALL SCORE
93 / 100
Good

SCORE BREAKDOWN

6-axis score

SOV (industry share)SOV(Share of Voice) = 自社言及率。 AI への質問全体のうち、 何 % で自社が言及されたかを示す指標。GOOD
92.0/ 100

Citation share within the industry: self / (self + competitors top 10).View details →

Position quality順位の質 = AI が回答内で挙げた引用順位。 上位ほど高スコア(0-100)。LOW
38.0/ 100

Average position when cited by AI, normalized to 0–100.View details →

Sentiment好意性(Sentiment) = AI 回答内での自社言及が ポジティブ寄りかネガティブ寄りか。GOOD
78.0/ 100

Weighted average of positive / neutral / negative tone in citation context.View details →

Source diversityドメイン多様性 = AI があなたを紹介する時、 何種類の違うサイトを情報源に しているか。 1〜2 サイト依存だと低スコア、 多様なサイトから引用されると AI に「信頼できる発信源」と 認識されやすくなります。GOOD
85.0/ 100

How many different websites cite you. Lots of unique sources = AI sees you as a trusted, broadly-recognized entity. Few sources = AI may see you as a niche or single-source entity.View details →

Media coverageメディア掲載 = 外部ニュース / 業界メディアから の引用量。AI への信頼性シグナル。GOOD
95.0/ 100

Mentions on Wikipedia and third-party media.

HP qualityHP 品質 = AI に正確に拾われやすい HP 構造の有無。 Schema.org / FAQ / 冒頭サマリ等 を点数化します。
0.0/ 100

Structural quality of your homepage (Schema.org / llms.txt / signals).View details →

Your score per AIAI 別 観測ボリューム = AI が質問への回答時に 「参考リンク」として参照した URL の総量。 ⚠️ これは自社の引用数では ありません。 【他指標との違い】 ・自社が AI 回答本文で言及 されたか → SOV / 言及 banner ・AI が外部リンクを どれだけ参照したか → ここ Gemini > Claude なら Gemini の grounding(根拠探し)が active、 という解釈。自社の引用獲得は 別途 SOV / 言及を確認。

Weekly auto observation · last 30 days · self citations / SOV / avg position per AI

ClaudeGood
4self citations of 9 total
Self SOV 44.4%Avg pos 1.8
ChatGPTGood
2self citations of 6 total
Self SOV 33.3%Avg pos 2.9
GeminiNeeds work
1self citations of 3 total
Self SOV 33.3%Avg pos 4.5

TOPIC RANKING

Industry ranking by Topic

Top 5 brands AI (Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini) cited most for each Topic, plus your rank.

営業支援 SaaS
of 16 brands tracked
  1. 1首位
    SalesBridge
    company
    114
  2. 2
    MarkeHub
    company
    105
  3. 3
    DealFlow
    company
    90
  4. 4
    WorkDesk
    company
    84
  5. 5
    SalesNavi
    company
    72
  1. 1stTOP
    SalesBridge
    38
  2. 2nd
    MarkeHub
    35
  3. 3rd
    DealFlow
    30
  4. 4th
    WorkDesk
    28
  5. 5th
    SalesNavi
    24
  6. 16thYOU
    Your service
    38
Industry benchmark100% of #1 (rank 16 of 16)

STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES

Strengths & Weaknesses

STRENGTHS
  1. Credibility from ITreview #1 ranking
  2. Breadth of API integrations
  3. Depth of mid-market deployments
WEAKNESSES
  1. Name disappears in foreign-vendor comparisons
  2. Pricing information is opaque
  3. Weak appeal to SMEs / sole proprietors

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Recommended actions

Improvement proposals the LLM generated from the current score and industry benchmarks. Prioritise by time horizon and execute.

Short term· 1-2 months
  • Launch a pricing page on the official site

    /pricing is not yet public. Make it structured data the AI can cite.

    Expected impact

    +22 pts (1-2 months)

  • Normalise listings on comparison sites

    Update the company pages on ITreview / BOXIL.

    Expected impact

    +22 pts (1-2 months)

Mid term· 3-6 months
  • Publish a whitepaper around '××CRM alternative'

    Distribute via PR TIMES + corporate blog to drive secondary citations.

    Expected impact

    +41 pts (3-6 months)

  • Monthly series on API integration case studies

    1 post per week, 24 articles in 6 months.

    Expected impact

    +41 pts (3-6 months)

Long term· 6+ months
  • Host your own industry conference

    Target SaaS Summit Tokyo scale; manufacture media exposure.

    Expected impact

    +67 pts (6+ months)

  • English-language PR to overseas media

    Contributions to TechCrunch / The Verge.

    Expected impact

    +67 pts (6+ months)

HP FIX PACK

HP fix pack

On the Pro plan, 3 ready-to-paste text drafts (Schema.org JSON-LD / llms.txt / FAQ) — picked from your observation as 'likely to lift AI citation rate' — are generated automatically.

On the Pro plan we auto-generate Schema.org JSON-LD / llms.txt / FAQ drafts (8 items) for your site, ready to copy and paste.

Unlock with Pro →

OBSERVED PROMPTS PER TOPIC

TopicTopic = AI 検索の切り口キーワード。 「特茶 + 健康効果」のように 事業名と組み合わせて、 AI への質問パターンを生成します。 別 観測プロンプト

Topic ごとに生成された プロンプトプロンプト = AI に実際に投げる質問文。 例:「おすすめの特茶を教えて」 各 Topic から複数の自然なプロンプトを 自動生成し、回答内に自社が 出てくるかを観測します。と、各 AI への引用獲得状況。

● AI Consultation

Discuss this report with an AI

Copy the observation and recommended actions as Markdown with one tap. Paste into ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini and start a deeper conversation about priorities and concrete next steps.

Observation info

AI engines
Claude · ChatGPT · Gemini
Topic count
4
Generated at

Pro plan

What this sample does not show you

Free diagnostic (free, one-shot)
  • AI engines observed: Gemini only
  • 1 Service · 1 Topic, one snapshot
  • 6-axis score + competitor Top 5
  • Improvement actions: 3 baseline items
Pro plan (¥49,800 / month)
  • AI engines observed: all three — Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini
  • 3 Services × 4 Topics (up to 12 Topics in parallel)
  • Weekly auto observation for continuous tracking
  • Per-Topic SOV + side-by-side competitor Top 5
  • Improvement roadmap + KB insights (full LLM output + industry evidence)
  • PDF report (for internal sharing and sales decks)
  • Coming soon: weekly alerts / CSV time-series
Start with free diagnostic →Pro plan details / sign upCancel any time. Billing starts on day one.

Share this report

XLinkedIn
← Back to 営業支援 SaaS rankings