Start free →

Sample (fictional) · 士業 · 東京 税理士

SERVICE OBSERVATION REPORT

(Fictional) Tokyo Tax Office— AI visibilityGENERATED 2026-07-04

OVERALL SCORE
75 / 100
Good

SCORE BREAKDOWN

6-axis score

SOV (industry share)SOV(Share of Voice) = 自社言及率。 AI への質問全体のうち、 何 % で自社が言及されたかを示す指標。GOOD
76.0/ 100

Citation share within the industry: self / (self + competitors top 10).View details →

Position quality順位の質 = AI が回答内で挙げた引用順位。 上位ほど高スコア(0-100)。LOW
27.0/ 100

Average position when cited by AI, normalized to 0–100.View details →

Sentiment好意性(Sentiment) = AI 回答内での自社言及が ポジティブ寄りかネガティブ寄りか。GOOD
79.0/ 100

Weighted average of positive / neutral / negative tone in citation context.View details →

Source diversityドメイン多様性 = AI があなたを紹介する時、 何種類の違うサイトを情報源に しているか。 1〜2 サイト依存だと低スコア、 多様なサイトから引用されると AI に「信頼できる発信源」と 認識されやすくなります。GOOD
72.0/ 100

How many different websites cite you. Lots of unique sources = AI sees you as a trusted, broadly-recognized entity. Few sources = AI may see you as a niche or single-source entity.View details →

Media coverageメディア掲載 = 外部ニュース / 業界メディアから の引用量。AI への信頼性シグナル。GOOD
82.0/ 100

Mentions on Wikipedia and third-party media.

HP qualityHP 品質 = AI に正確に拾われやすい HP 構造の有無。 Schema.org / FAQ / 冒頭サマリ等 を点数化します。
0.0/ 100

Structural quality of your homepage (Schema.org / llms.txt / signals).View details →

Your score per AIAI 別 観測ボリューム = AI が質問への回答時に 「参考リンク」として参照した URL の総量。 ⚠️ これは自社の引用数では ありません。 【他指標との違い】 ・自社が AI 回答本文で言及 されたか → SOV / 言及 banner ・AI が外部リンクを どれだけ参照したか → ここ Gemini > Claude なら Gemini の grounding(根拠探し)が active、 という解釈。自社の引用獲得は 別途 SOV / 言及を確認。

Weekly auto observation · last 30 days · self citations / SOV / avg position per AI

ClaudeGood
3self citations of 7 total
Self SOV 42.9%Avg pos 1.8
ChatGPTGood
1self citations of 4 total
Self SOV 25.0%Avg pos 2.9
GeminiNeeds work
0self citations of 1 total
Self SOV 0.0%Avg pos 4.5

TOPIC RANKING

Industry ranking by Topic

Top 5 brands AI (Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini) cited most for each Topic, plus your rank.

東京 税理士
of 11 brands tracked
  1. 1首位
    Aoyama Partners (fictional)
    company
    102
  2. 2
    Marunouchi Sogo (fictional)
    company
    93
  3. 3
    Shibuya Startup (fictional)
    company
    84
  4. 4
    Minato Souzoku (fictional)
    company
    75
  5. 5
    Shinjuku Freelance (fictional)
    company
    66
  1. 1stTOP
    Aoyama Partners (fictional)
    34
  2. 2nd
    Marunouchi Sogo (fictional)
    31
  3. 3rd
    Shibuya Startup (fictional)
    28
  4. 4th
    Minato Souzoku (fictional)
    25
  5. 5th
    Shinjuku Freelance (fictional)
    22
  6. 11thYOU
    Your service
    27
Industry benchmark79% of #1 (rank 11 of 11)

STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES

Strengths & Weaknesses

STRENGTHS
  1. Credibility from ITreview #1 ranking
  2. Breadth of API integrations
  3. Depth of mid-market deployments
WEAKNESSES
  1. Name disappears in foreign-vendor comparisons
  2. Pricing information is opaque
  3. Weak appeal to SMEs / sole proprietors

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

Recommended actions

Improvement proposals the LLM generated from the current score and industry benchmarks. Prioritise by time horizon and execute.

Short term· 1-2 months
  • Launch a pricing page on the official site

    /pricing is not yet public. Make it structured data the AI can cite.

    Expected impact

    +22 pts (1-2 months)

  • Normalise listings on comparison sites

    Update the company pages on ITreview / BOXIL.

    Expected impact

    +22 pts (1-2 months)

Mid term· 3-6 months
  • Publish a whitepaper around '××CRM alternative'

    Distribute via PR TIMES + corporate blog to drive secondary citations.

    Expected impact

    +41 pts (3-6 months)

  • Monthly series on API integration case studies

    1 post per week, 24 articles in 6 months.

    Expected impact

    +41 pts (3-6 months)

Long term· 6+ months
  • Host your own industry conference

    Target SaaS Summit Tokyo scale; manufacture media exposure.

    Expected impact

    +67 pts (6+ months)

  • English-language PR to overseas media

    Contributions to TechCrunch / The Verge.

    Expected impact

    +67 pts (6+ months)

HP FIX PACK

HP fix pack

On the Pro plan, 3 ready-to-paste text drafts (Schema.org JSON-LD / llms.txt / FAQ) — picked from your observation as 'likely to lift AI citation rate' — are generated automatically.

On the Pro plan we auto-generate Schema.org JSON-LD / llms.txt / FAQ drafts (8 items) for your site, ready to copy and paste.

Unlock with Pro →

OBSERVED PROMPTS PER TOPIC

TopicTopic = AI 検索の切り口キーワード。 「特茶 + 健康効果」のように 事業名と組み合わせて、 AI への質問パターンを生成します。 別 観測プロンプト

Topic ごとに生成された プロンプトプロンプト = AI に実際に投げる質問文。 例:「おすすめの特茶を教えて」 各 Topic から複数の自然なプロンプトを 自動生成し、回答内に自社が 出てくるかを観測します。と、各 AI への引用獲得状況。

● AI Consultation

Discuss this report with an AI

Copy the observation and recommended actions as Markdown with one tap. Paste into ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini and start a deeper conversation about priorities and concrete next steps.

Observation info

AI engines
Claude · ChatGPT · Gemini
Topic count
4
Generated at

Pro plan

What this sample does not show you

Free diagnostic (free, one-shot)
  • AI engines observed: Gemini only
  • 1 Service · 1 Topic, one snapshot
  • 6-axis score + competitor Top 5
  • Improvement actions: 3 baseline items
Pro plan (¥49,800 / month)
  • AI engines observed: all three — Claude / ChatGPT / Gemini
  • 3 Services × 4 Topics (up to 12 Topics in parallel)
  • Weekly auto observation for continuous tracking
  • Per-Topic SOV + side-by-side competitor Top 5
  • Improvement roadmap + KB insights (full LLM output + industry evidence)
  • PDF report (for internal sharing and sales decks)
  • Coming soon: weekly alerts / CSV time-series
Start with free diagnostic →Pro plan details / sign upCancel any time. Billing starts on day one.

Share this report

XLinkedIn
← Back to 東京 税理士 rankings